Iteration 5 verification strategy defined via CEO agent review
Source type:
obs· Harvested: 2026-05-03 · Original date: 2026-05-03T14:28:05.674Z Metadata:{"project":"lunhsiangyuan","type":"decision","obs_id":65096}
obs/65096 · decision · 2026-05-03T14:28:05.674Z
Iteration 5 verification strategy defined via CEO agent review
CEO agent (GPT-5.5-high via cursor agent CLI) reviewed iteration 4 outcomes and confirmed iteration 5 strategy focusing on RHAP FY26 NOFO ground-truth verification rather than premature attachment drafting. Agent emphasized seven-week deadline creates highest risk in eligibility, consortium assembly, and governance decisions that cannot be fixed late, not in narrative writing. Verification plan mandates cross-checking four authoritative sources to confirm whether NOFO actually posted on forecasted 4/23/2026 date (ten days prior to current date). Eleven-point prioritized data extraction list starts with submission deadline and eligibility rules before moving to scoring and requirements. Agent structured three decision branches with clear next moves: if NOFO confirms forecast, iter-06 attacks consortium composition, lead applicant governance, and service area scope rather than starting narrative; if materially different (deadline passed, funding reduced, eligibility mismatch, consortium burden heavier), RHAP downgrades to secondary with NY RHT becoming primary; if not yet posted, team establishes daily monitoring without committing to full attachment development. Success criterion defined as obtaining cited authoritative source confirming either NOFO posted with exact opportunity number and deadline, or definitively not posted/deferred with evidence. Agent also flagged 3/20/2026 deadline reference from iter-04 NY RHT search as requiring source trace to confirm relevance.
Concepts: [“pattern”,“why-it-exists”,“how-it-works”,“trade-off”]
Facts: [“CEO agent confirmed iteration 5 focus on RHAP FY26 NOFO verification across four authoritative sources: Grants.gov opportunity listing, simpler.grants.gov RHAP page, HRSA RHSA-26-xxx landing page, and Federal Register for status changes”,“Eleven critical data points prioritized for extraction: submission deadline (highest priority), opportunity identity, eligibility rules, funding terms, match/cost sharing, page limits, required attachments, scoring rubric, program requirements, submission mechanics, and technical assistance availability”,“Three decision branches defined: NOFO posted and confirmed triggers bid/no-bid plus consortium lock in iter-06, materially different triggers RHAP downgrade to secondary target, not yet posted triggers daily watch without full attachment development”,“Three most expensive-to-fix-late decisions identified: consortium composition (which 3 providers qualify and can sign MOU), lead applicant and network governance model, and service area/intervention scope alignment with RHAP scoring preferences”,“Output artifact specified as research/rhap-fy26-ground-truth.md with CEO decision, source log, NOFO data matrix, forecast vs reality comparison, eligibility read, submission requirements, expensive-to-fix-late decisions, 3/20/2026 deadline trace, and iter-06 recommendation”]
[← 回 Alfred Brain Hub]