Implemented Gemini 3 Pro narrative review script for v4 format critique
Source type:
obs· Harvested: 2026-05-04 · Original date: 2026-05-03T17:59:13.488Z Metadata:{"project":"lunhsiangyuan","type":"feature","obs_id":65222}
obs/65222 · feature · 2026-05-03T17:59:13.488Z
Implemented Gemini 3 Pro narrative review script for v4 format critique
實作了 Gemini 3 Pro API 調用腳本，回應使用者「v4 還是太散了」的反饋。Script 使用新的 google.genai SDK（1.62.0），從 4 個 topic 載入 v4 narrative，構建詳細 prompt 要求 Gemini 扮演敘事理論專家（引用 Aristotle、McKee、Pinker），從 4 個角度診斷「散」的根因：(1) 敘事結構（多 story 有無 throughline）、(2) 資訊架構（7 種 anchor 是否過載）、(3) 語言節奏（書面 vs 口語）、(4) case-report 類比有效性。要求輸出 ≤3 個根因、可執行改進建議、以及一個 200-300 字的示範改寫。這實現了「自我觸發第二意見」的 CLAUDE.md 規範，用外部 AI 抓 Claude 自己看不到的敘事盲點。
Concepts: [“how-it-works”,“why-it-exists”,“pattern”]
Facts: [“Created /tmp/gemini-narrative-review.py using new google.genai SDK 1.62.0”,“Script reads GEMINI_API_KEY from ~/.claude/.env and loads all 4 topic narratives from wiki/{topic}/index.md”,“Prompt positions Gemini as narrative editor versed in Aristotle Poetics, McKee “Story”, Pinker “The Sense of Style"",“Requests analysis across 4 dimensions: narrative structure (throughline, thematic coherence), information architecture (7 anchor types balance), language rhythm (formality, transitions), case-report analogy effectiveness”,“Asks for ≤3 root causes, actionable prompt modification suggestions, and 200-300 word rewrite example of grants-compliance story”,“Uses gemini-3-pro-preview model with max_output_tokens=8192 and thinking_level=low configuration”,“Feeds grants-compliance full narrative and medical-oncology partial text (3000 chars) for comparative analysis”]
[← 回 Alfred Brain Hub]